Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 15:39:19 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADF97A91912CF8DAB7A318D4F42C6851D2BCD5D2C73A54B8C030C286F4E2DD23
Participant Details

Original Note:

The report does not conclude that raccoon dogs were the vector from which humans became infected with COVID19. It concludes only that an animal vector is plausible (without establishing the species or conditions of transmission.) NYTs own article archived due to paywalling. https://archive.ph/n5vS4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636665151796523014
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADF97A91912CF8DAB7A318D4F42C6851D2BCD5D2C73A54B8C030C286F4E2DD23
  • createdAtMillis - 1679067559961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1636665151796523014ADF97A91912CF8DAB7A318D4F42C6851D2BCD5D2C73A54B8C030C286F4E2DD23