Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 23:46:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3014D1B3744E172CC580AF321646A8BF5EB6E925421A2E92A15B1733F601C0AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses opinion in an ongoing public controversy. Interpretations are subjective and debatable by nature. Community Notes is not intended as a mechanism of imposing partiality in public discourse. Counterarguments should be replies and not community notes. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1636512983198101504
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 3014D1B3744E172CC580AF321646A8BF5EB6E925421A2E92A15B1733F601C0AB
createdAtMillis - 1679010371093
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16365129831981015043014D1B3744E172CC580AF321646A8BF5EB6E925421A2E92A15B1733F601C0AB