Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 12:31:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 464F514091F013106E190C712492FDDD7A2F35D38B0E762F31374CC21B9FD858
Participant Details

Original Note:

One of the *possible* reparation details being considered does, indeed, include such a payout. It should be noted that this is not the only plan considered by the committee. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/19/us/san-francisco-reparations-proposal-reaj/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636433997227016211
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 464F514091F013106E190C712492FDDD7A2F35D38B0E762F31374CC21B9FD858
  • createdAtMillis - 1679056269833
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636433997227016211464F514091F013106E190C712492FDDD7A2F35D38B0E762F31374CC21B9FD858