Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 17:33:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D6E02FC90F5D3E0307F50EEFBA8E522C5B7075FEC7BC45FF8D869F74D988740F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The second amendment being penned in the 18th century does not invalidate its protection of modern weapons. Nor does Durbins point even relate to the central premise of Bruen (on concealed carry or historical tradition.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636407545513361423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D6E02FC90F5D3E0307F50EEFBA8E522C5B7075FEC7BC45FF8D869F74D988740F
  • createdAtMillis - 1678988010637
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636407545513361423D6E02FC90F5D3E0307F50EEFBA8E522C5B7075FEC7BC45FF8D869F74D988740F