Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 21:59:58 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FBF88F02D7713D55B02127F7252CD46C4B44084EC5220A3E7390EE73058505E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The second amendment being penned in the 18th century does not invalidate its protection of modern weapons. Nor does Durbins point even relate to the central premise of Bruen (on concealed carry or historical tradition.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636407545513361423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8FBF88F02D7713D55B02127F7252CD46C4B44084EC5220A3E7390EE73058505E
  • createdAtMillis - 1679003998093
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16364075455133614238FBF88F02D7713D55B02127F7252CD46C4B44084EC5220A3E7390EE73058505E