Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 20:15:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BEA7D24AC467326820F71EA8EC6DE472F6506D0C9521A22394C2D7807F6777F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The second amendment being penned in the 18th century does not invalidate its protection of modern weapons. Nor does Durbins point even relate to the central premise of Bruen (on concealed carry or historical tradition.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636407545513361423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5BEA7D24AC467326820F71EA8EC6DE472F6506D0C9521A22394C2D7807F6777F
  • createdAtMillis - 1678997740480
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16364075455133614235BEA7D24AC467326820F71EA8EC6DE472F6506D0C9521A22394C2D7807F6777F