Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 23:25:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 572C597C52C54D09CB61D14E544684C451C9E382996D321FE51FAE18B6E2E7B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The second amendment being penned in the 18th century does not invalidate its protection of modern weapons. Nor does Durbins point even relate to the central premise of Bruen (on concealed carry or historical tradition.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636407545513361423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 572C597C52C54D09CB61D14E544684C451C9E382996D321FE51FAE18B6E2E7B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1679009141666
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636407545513361423572C597C52C54D09CB61D14E544684C451C9E382996D321FE51FAE18B6E2E7B0