Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 20:49:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33CD18E8B33E288A1DD75E9EE879DBE9325F1729873AA25DDE2F2BE2F4D7174E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The second amendment being penned in the 18th century does not invalidate its protection of modern weapons. Nor does Durbins point even relate to the central premise of Bruen (on concealed carry or historical tradition.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636407545513361423
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 33CD18E8B33E288A1DD75E9EE879DBE9325F1729873AA25DDE2F2BE2F4D7174E
  • createdAtMillis - 1678999783967
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163640754551336142333CD18E8B33E288A1DD75E9EE879DBE9325F1729873AA25DDE2F2BE2F4D7174E