Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 17:10:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C00B4A6EDD85B299EAEDA0A10B95C7C51034941B3F5BACB7EAFF0363217DC50B
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP makes statement of fact that comes from one speculative line unsupported in the article. The article does contain information about the subject that is considered fact. OP then links her opinion to the erroneous fact to make a point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636373166917574666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C00B4A6EDD85B299EAEDA0A10B95C7C51034941B3F5BACB7EAFF0363217DC50B
  • createdAtMillis - 1678986632475
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1636373166917574666C00B4A6EDD85B299EAEDA0A10B95C7C51034941B3F5BACB7EAFF0363217DC50B