Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 15:01:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F6DA7EBD3E456CC143F3B7970A2B2C5A641A6C65F05A9FE8C9E4BD129240A1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP makes statement of fact that comes from one speculative line unsupported in the article. The article does contain information about the subject that is considered fact. OP then links her opinion to the erroneous fact to make a point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636373166917574666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F6DA7EBD3E456CC143F3B7970A2B2C5A641A6C65F05A9FE8C9E4BD129240A1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1678978909506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16363731669175746663F6DA7EBD3E456CC143F3B7970A2B2C5A641A6C65F05A9FE8C9E4BD129240A1C