Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 16:02:28 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D24750CCCD337734B1139E6E46A7B9D7E8F1ED1AAB5DE2624C8E7F97BDA2F7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP makes statement of fact that comes from one speculative line unsupported in the article. The article does contain information about the subject that is considered fact. OP then links her opinion to the erroneous fact to make a point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636373166917574666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D24750CCCD337734B1139E6E46A7B9D7E8F1ED1AAB5DE2624C8E7F97BDA2F7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1678982548865
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16363731669175746662D24750CCCD337734B1139E6E46A7B9D7E8F1ED1AAB5DE2624C8E7F97BDA2F7C