Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-15 18:38:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7C3D9045DB201717338A4E5B155CA10B42FD436F5E445E6D61ADD089A0E8CE1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is opinion/not factually misleading, proposed note is irrelevant as tweet isn't making any claims on book sales. No note needed. 'Community Notes are not meant for quick dunks, personal opinions, speculation, or insults.' Disagreement/Debate should be in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1636069076085932032
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E7C3D9045DB201717338A4E5B155CA10B42FD436F5E445E6D61ADD089A0E8CE1
createdAtMillis - 1678905538681
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1636069076085932032E7C3D9045DB201717338A4E5B155CA10B42FD436F5E445E6D61ADD089A0E8CE1