Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-15 19:44:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B65E6D540B6EF683DF969A320E058B3632C298B57B1EC3E87EB4FCAC148B2706
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is opinion/not factually misleading, proposed note is irrelevant as tweet isn't making any claims on book sales. No note needed. 'Community Notes are not meant for quick dunks, personal opinions, speculation, or insults.' Disagreement/Debate should be in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1636069076085932032
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B65E6D540B6EF683DF969A320E058B3632C298B57B1EC3E87EB4FCAC148B2706
createdAtMillis - 1678909456418
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1636069076085932032B65E6D540B6EF683DF969A320E058B3632C298B57B1EC3E87EB4FCAC148B2706