Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-15 18:28:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83FD5472D2F3E16F0304BEB3175143636C2EE8F72591C2CE7FB7B20B7C69B0A7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is opinion/not factually misleading, proposed note is irrelevant as tweet isn't making any claims on book sales. No note needed. 'Community Notes are not meant for quick dunks, personal opinions, speculation, or insults.' Disagreement/Debate should be in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1636069076085932032
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 83FD5472D2F3E16F0304BEB3175143636C2EE8F72591C2CE7FB7B20B7C69B0A7
createdAtMillis - 1678904884939
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 163606907608593203283FD5472D2F3E16F0304BEB3175143636C2EE8F72591C2CE7FB7B20B7C69B0A7