Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 00:21:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 133E1CCD2C408EA752D8FC96AA52A35B6E70A29BF8C229BE942D6F6E9A3F5648
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is opinion/not factually misleading, proposed note is irrelevant as tweet isn't making any claims on book sales. No note needed. 'Community Notes are not meant for quick dunks, personal opinions, speculation, or insults.' Disagreement/Debate should be in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1636069076085932032
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 133E1CCD2C408EA752D8FC96AA52A35B6E70A29BF8C229BE942D6F6E9A3F5648
createdAtMillis - 1678926093314
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1636069076085932032133E1CCD2C408EA752D8FC96AA52A35B6E70A29BF8C229BE942D6F6E9A3F5648