Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-15 18:39:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03FB0547904DBE683B7D573F2A9A1CF1313A650421424CAC96C1F77E57A2F35D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is opinion/not factually misleading, proposed note is irrelevant as tweet isn't making any claims on book sales. No note needed. 'Community Notes are not meant for quick dunks, personal opinions, speculation, or insults.' Disagreement/Debate should be in the replies. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1636069076085932032
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 03FB0547904DBE683B7D573F2A9A1CF1313A650421424CAC96C1F77E57A2F35D
createdAtMillis - 1678905598499
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 163606907608593203203FB0547904DBE683B7D573F2A9A1CF1313A650421424CAC96C1F77E57A2F35D