Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-01 02:42:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF7BBCD17B75CDEAE2AA42F0A83A3D5876577963DBE684E4EE642873FDDE16EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

On the points in the suggested note: 1. Reasons for are irrelevant, claim in tweet is correct. 2 & 3. Irrelevant. 4 & 5. Doesn't say where it didn't happen. 6. There is no obligation for tweets to always provide sources. Debates should be in the replies, not in notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635962350573322244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF7BBCD17B75CDEAE2AA42F0A83A3D5876577963DBE684E4EE642873FDDE16EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1714531377502
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635962350573322244AF7BBCD17B75CDEAE2AA42F0A83A3D5876577963DBE684E4EE642873FDDE16EE