Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-15 15:04:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF4759196F38A3054B95D8354C40FE0DF17BB78A3E49E9B23D8DAAD99604AFFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

On the points in the suggested note: 1. Reasons for are irrelevant, claim in tweet is correct. 2 & 3. Irrelevant. 4 & 5. Doesn't say where it didn't happen. 6. There is no obligation for tweets to always provide sources. Debates should be in the replies, not in notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635962350573322244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF4759196F38A3054B95D8354C40FE0DF17BB78A3E49E9B23D8DAAD99604AFFF
  • createdAtMillis - 1678892662080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635962350573322244AF4759196F38A3054B95D8354C40FE0DF17BB78A3E49E9B23D8DAAD99604AFFF