Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-15 12:56:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AD501D92F21DD599C13230A1E48F6DFAE406B19917069FD8D7CCC80FD70793D
Participant Details

Original Note:

On the points in the suggested note: 1. Reasons for are irrelevant, claim in tweet is correct. 2 & 3. Irrelevant. 4 & 5. Doesn't say where it didn't happen. 6. There is no obligation for tweets to always provide sources. Debates should be in the replies, not in notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635962350573322244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4AD501D92F21DD599C13230A1E48F6DFAE406B19917069FD8D7CCC80FD70793D
  • createdAtMillis - 1678884991191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16359623505733222444AD501D92F21DD599C13230A1E48F6DFAE406B19917069FD8D7CCC80FD70793D