Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 10:20:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BD2390289529901C791637C16721B05C3A6BB859F063E0E81735673D62F8538
Participant Details

Original Note:

On the points in the suggested note: 1. Reasons for are irrelevant, claim in tweet is correct. 2 & 3. Irrelevant. 4 & 5. Doesn't say where it didn't happen. 6. There is no obligation for tweets to always provide sources. Debates should be in the replies, not in notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635962350573322244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0BD2390289529901C791637C16721B05C3A6BB859F063E0E81735673D62F8538
  • createdAtMillis - 1679048421503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16359623505733222440BD2390289529901C791637C16721B05C3A6BB859F063E0E81735673D62F8538