Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 03:39:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D285803A0E3F122D6D96D7284B611252C0DD32CD959F9FE03A3AD964E4BECE0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet, in addition to being an opinion and so not worthy of a note in the first place, makes none of the claims the suggested note is replying to.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635739441187749905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D285803A0E3F122D6D96D7284B611252C0DD32CD959F9FE03A3AD964E4BECE0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1678937942088
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635739441187749905D285803A0E3F122D6D96D7284B611252C0DD32CD959F9FE03A3AD964E4BECE0E