Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-16 06:38:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39DBF1CC7F85DF403E9C5D847B2CC7E8D743AD5CA7CEAE60B2EC1F21E22E7380
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is an opinion piece written in the opinion section of a national newspaper. The author makes his reasoning for his opinion within the article. Counter-opinions, no matter how strong, belong in the replies or as quote tweets, not as community notes. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1635655068136480769
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 39DBF1CC7F85DF403E9C5D847B2CC7E8D743AD5CA7CEAE60B2EC1F21E22E7380
createdAtMillis - 1678948699829
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 163565506813648076939DBF1CC7F85DF403E9C5D847B2CC7E8D743AD5CA7CEAE60B2EC1F21E22E7380