Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-22 05:28:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

A direct screenshot and quote from the WSJ article is posted. A user's opinion, "why SVB failed", should not be the catalyst for a community note. A note is not required for this tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635523720323432448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1682141331198
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163552372032343244847AD3BD4ED0E64C9EA74DB3A322FA6AA5E5F8D84E57A6E405CC624F53C571EC8