Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 07:49:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDB818F3FA4C86E4608EA68EA707260474855DA0117B9C3D05DB4C088BF9CA18
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study used P-Hacking to obtain fraudulent results regarding vaccine adverse reactions. The study compared events per 10,000 (including multiple events per person) with hospitalizations per 10,000 (counting each individual only once). Adverse events were double counted. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/peer-review-fail-vaccine-publishes-antivax-propaganda/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635472615803322368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BDB818F3FA4C86E4608EA68EA707260474855DA0117B9C3D05DB4C088BF9CA18
  • createdAtMillis - 1678780170989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635472615803322368BDB818F3FA4C86E4608EA68EA707260474855DA0117B9C3D05DB4C088BF9CA18