Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 11:56:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7DC89D2DE9653BB2122AF8EB083982AA3D0CD960359A77ACC1E8CCF41E7080A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study used P-Hacking to obtain fraudulent results regarding vaccine adverse reactions. The study compared events per 10,000 (including multiple events per person) with hospitalizations per 10,000 (counting each individual only once). Adverse events were double counted. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/peer-review-fail-vaccine-publishes-antivax-propaganda/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635472615803322368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7DC89D2DE9653BB2122AF8EB083982AA3D0CD960359A77ACC1E8CCF41E7080A
  • createdAtMillis - 1678794986085
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635472615803322368B7DC89D2DE9653BB2122AF8EB083982AA3D0CD960359A77ACC1E8CCF41E7080A