Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 07:28:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF48E72D49F44C56A6B5002EF13D051C7A66E07CEFA45C9645D5551777A38F8F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study used P-Hacking to obtain fraudulent results regarding vaccine adverse reactions. The study compared events per 10,000 (including multiple events per person) with hospitalizations per 10,000 (counting each individual only once). Adverse events were double counted. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/peer-review-fail-vaccine-publishes-antivax-propaganda/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635472615803322368
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF48E72D49F44C56A6B5002EF13D051C7A66E07CEFA45C9645D5551777A38F8F
  • createdAtMillis - 1678778888820
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635472615803322368AF48E72D49F44C56A6B5002EF13D051C7A66E07CEFA45C9645D5551777A38F8F