Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 04:12:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 16225E4AF968E31FD07DFA25D1098E21A249C6C57C77232129298DE526F7C785
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet doesn't claim the retroactive insurance is taxpayer-funded; proposed note is irrelevant. OP is offering an opinion in any event.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635469690859405312
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 16225E4AF968E31FD07DFA25D1098E21A249C6C57C77232129298DE526F7C785
  • createdAtMillis - 1678767169455
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163546969085940531216225E4AF968E31FD07DFA25D1098E21A249C6C57C77232129298DE526F7C785