Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 16:13:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E3F6EB4AAF7233033251BACE0F0325D12DBDA5E1D67354D15807134017D9D96
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses opinion. Regardless of Time's stated reasons, they're not privileged to protection from criticism. Regardless of the publication's stated intentions, it is totalitarian to impose upon an opinion what is essentially free PR work for Time. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635435854624702466
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E3F6EB4AAF7233033251BACE0F0325D12DBDA5E1D67354D15807134017D9D96
  • createdAtMillis - 1679069639779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16354358546247024660E3F6EB4AAF7233033251BACE0F0325D12DBDA5E1D67354D15807134017D9D96