Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 05:41:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 954F400C870701B5AB8071569BB12106574CFD7E719038264AF866B0CF0B2294
Participant Details

Original Note:

Part 1 is factual and the video verifies it showing he did return to a standing ovation. Therefore, this part needs no context imho Part 2 is an opinion, and while it may or may not insult others, according to Community notes, there is no need for context on opinions https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1635408028752048130
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 954F400C870701B5AB8071569BB12106574CFD7E719038264AF866B0CF0B2294
createdAtMillis - 1678772470320
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1635408028752048130954F400C870701B5AB8071569BB12106574CFD7E719038264AF866B0CF0B2294