Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 05:26:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A236099B470D8A33953FB2EA2C12CD7CD2048B1320E0235CE92B2CE72B5B0D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Part 1 is factual and the video verifies it showing he did return to a standing ovation. Therefore, this part needs no context imho Part 2 is an opinion, and while it may or may not insult others, according to Community notes, there is no need for context on opinions https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635408028752048130
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A236099B470D8A33953FB2EA2C12CD7CD2048B1320E0235CE92B2CE72B5B0D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1678771611550
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16354080287520481304A236099B470D8A33953FB2EA2C12CD7CD2048B1320E0235CE92B2CE72B5B0D5