Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-13 22:09:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0D7554E2FCD9B10EA033B6FDBFF994D522A7AEDFEA734703D1CDEA3A7C5EF08
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet text infers that Ke Huy Quan would not have been eligible for refugee status when in fact his family was covered under a resettlement program, not just showing up at the border and claiming refugee status. https://newrepublic.com/post/171111/ke-huy-quan-oscar-win-everything-everywhere-asylum-bans

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635399620082782209
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0D7554E2FCD9B10EA033B6FDBFF994D522A7AEDFEA734703D1CDEA3A7C5EF08
  • createdAtMillis - 1678745359017
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635399620082782209A0D7554E2FCD9B10EA033B6FDBFF994D522A7AEDFEA734703D1CDEA3A7C5EF08