Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 16:56:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53E10ED0CD6424D047A83B1225BE1D6CA37C3053EB28AD38C10B699759707C60
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet is clearly criticizing the opinion piece in the WSJ, not citing it as fact. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635386530146426886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53E10ED0CD6424D047A83B1225BE1D6CA37C3053EB28AD38C10B699759707C60
  • createdAtMillis - 1678813007797
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163538653014642688653E10ED0CD6424D047A83B1225BE1D6CA37C3053EB28AD38C10B699759707C60