Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-14 11:23:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D0ECA593F9C479A5B8C39DFD0161095B838C040EB7FC9D44CACE12BBE5CB181
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Tweet is clearly criticizing the opinion piece in the WSJ, not citing it as fact. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635386530146426886
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D0ECA593F9C479A5B8C39DFD0161095B838C040EB7FC9D44CACE12BBE5CB181
  • createdAtMillis - 1678793021290
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16353865301464268860D0ECA593F9C479A5B8C39DFD0161095B838C040EB7FC9D44CACE12BBE5CB181