Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-13 21:02:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 157949CA27417AE3FA2F206BF999B2137E57038260C7F6E46A9CE23270241D9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note indicated Frank opposed the '18 updates to the Dodd-Frank bill; while the oped linked does say that, he SPECIFICALLY says in it the mistake with the original law was that the $50b floor was *too low*, which is the change referred to in tweet. Not misleading NNN https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/03/01/barney-frank-why-i-would-vote-no-on-senate-bill-to-amend-dodd-frank-commentary.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/05/24/a-lot-of-people-heard-what-barney-frank-said-about-the-new-banking-law-few-knew-he-works-for-a-bank/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1635358719943884800
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 157949CA27417AE3FA2F206BF999B2137E57038260C7F6E46A9CE23270241D9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1678741326096
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1635358719943884800157949CA27417AE3FA2F206BF999B2137E57038260C7F6E46A9CE23270241D9A