Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-13 00:36:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5052CF340ACD2A7DC57757A5EC5B5006062FCA2885D6E34C86498CEB0ACE8457
Participant Details

Original Note:

The specifics and conclusions on what would or would not be covered in this fluid situation for which all the info is not available to make such conclusory remarks. Take it to the comment section for your legal predications/textual interpretation of regulations. No note needed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634998713000009728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5052CF340ACD2A7DC57757A5EC5B5006062FCA2885D6E34C86498CEB0ACE8457
  • createdAtMillis - 1678667777195
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16349987130000097285052CF340ACD2A7DC57757A5EC5B5006062FCA2885D6E34C86498CEB0ACE8457