Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 13:28:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3ABD0394D95C123E1D72533FD34B38F4188B5A746CC489E1D6149D21378AB5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

There's conflicting reporting in this case, at a minimum it's not clearcut enough to post a Community Note that labels Paul's statement as "debunked". https://www.nationalreview.com/news/nih-admits-to-funding-gain-of-function-research-in-wuhan-says-ecohealth-violated-reporting-requirements/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634886188942204929
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3ABD0394D95C123E1D72533FD34B38F4188B5A746CC489E1D6149D21378AB5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1678627704060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634886188942204929B3ABD0394D95C123E1D72533FD34B38F4188B5A746CC489E1D6149D21378AB5A