Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 19:13:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86F42E35BA610093937E7FDA329728E75A525F927A03310C0C445E202D6C157E
Participant Details

Original Note:

There's conflicting reporting in this case, at a minimum it's not clearcut enough to post a Community Note that labels Paul's statement as "debunked". https://www.nationalreview.com/news/nih-admits-to-funding-gain-of-function-research-in-wuhan-says-ecohealth-violated-reporting-requirements/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634886188942204929
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86F42E35BA610093937E7FDA329728E75A525F927A03310C0C445E202D6C157E
  • createdAtMillis - 1678648412733
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163488618894220492986F42E35BA610093937E7FDA329728E75A525F927A03310C0C445E202D6C157E