Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 18:38:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 740F6D73F97B8D27F284BB7F194503D9C3475CE85CF3764D1FC47F5912712EC7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study cohort was mostly from high-income countries. While the results can be seen as good news, context matters. Note this from the conclusion of the actual study: "High risk of bias in many studies and substantial heterogeneity suggest caution in interpreting results." https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-074224

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634777191115526144
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 740F6D73F97B8D27F284BB7F194503D9C3475CE85CF3764D1FC47F5912712EC7
  • createdAtMillis - 1678646307567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634777191115526144740F6D73F97B8D27F284BB7F194503D9C3475CE85CF3764D1FC47F5912712EC7