Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 21:59:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFCE0B631D94CC25EF6F936311398F7B1A2B10F97E0E72152BF380DDE647CFBD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Says that the impact was minimal when it admits in the article it didnt account for multiple groups of people

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634303727455678465
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFCE0B631D94CC25EF6F936311398F7B1A2B10F97E0E72152BF380DDE647CFBD
  • createdAtMillis - 1678485579533
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634303727455678465EFCE0B631D94CC25EF6F936311398F7B1A2B10F97E0E72152BF380DDE647CFBD