Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-12 18:32:33 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A7C7A5DCA770234CEA0FF9E2A206B96681B894F0FF2EA168E34A438855AB14B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The review admits that it was lacking in data for many vulnerable groups, and that the findings in it can't necessarily be applied to everyone. https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-074224

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634211842779144192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A7C7A5DCA770234CEA0FF9E2A206B96681B894F0FF2EA168E34A438855AB14B
  • createdAtMillis - 1678645953913
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16342118427791441920A7C7A5DCA770234CEA0FF9E2A206B96681B894F0FF2EA168E34A438855AB14B