Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 15:48:54 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7ED22962E3CAC861EE12D28C254E84228CCE2FE34E4B5E0D51F01B9E1EDFCA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet merely proposes an ethical argument against defacing two flags representing two different ideas, not making misleading claims about the legality of flag burning or destruction on public property.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634210841993125896
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7ED22962E3CAC861EE12D28C254E84228CCE2FE34E4B5E0D51F01B9E1EDFCA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1678463334672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634210841993125896F7ED22962E3CAC861EE12D28C254E84228CCE2FE34E4B5E0D51F01B9E1EDFCA6