Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 20:53:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AB132421C138901451F308825D7A7B7689C0EE658D8A12A9B5749E9396857AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet merely proposes an ethical argument against defacing two flags representing two different ideas, not making misleading claims about the legality of flag burning or destruction on public property.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634210841993125896
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4AB132421C138901451F308825D7A7B7689C0EE658D8A12A9B5749E9396857AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1678481588713
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16342108419931258964AB132421C138901451F308825D7A7B7689C0EE658D8A12A9B5749E9396857AE