Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 13:29:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9CA3979CB695B65571E9DF1BFFC6B77C866B8D98B0102803B7A82303F8E3492
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note that says there's no China or Russia sources does not address the actual tweet as the Tweet does not mention specific sources. So the note is not needed. The Tweet as written is correct and repeating a question in the hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634007490923991040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9CA3979CB695B65571E9DF1BFFC6B77C866B8D98B0102803B7A82303F8E3492
  • createdAtMillis - 1678454988421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634007490923991040B9CA3979CB695B65571E9DF1BFFC6B77C866B8D98B0102803B7A82303F8E3492