Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 04:10:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 964B4BCCCB67412625FE09F5B5FAD3EF4458D6FE7FB7226545633B587FE1E205
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note that says there's no China or Russia sources does not address the actual tweet as the Tweet does not mention specific sources. So the note is not needed. The Tweet as written is correct and repeating a question in the hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634007490923991040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 964B4BCCCB67412625FE09F5B5FAD3EF4458D6FE7FB7226545633B587FE1E205
  • createdAtMillis - 1678421445857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1634007490923991040964B4BCCCB67412625FE09F5B5FAD3EF4458D6FE7FB7226545633B587FE1E205