Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-10 05:00:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8ABF72E78C6A98A486301599B58D873F4E32A5AB00FA63D71E7F3A9235A95A0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note that says there's no China or Russia sources does not address the actual tweet as the Tweet does not mention specific sources. So the note is not needed. The Tweet as written is correct and repeating a question in the hearing.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1634007490923991040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8ABF72E78C6A98A486301599B58D873F4E32A5AB00FA63D71E7F3A9235A95A0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1678424445985
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16340074909239910408ABF72E78C6A98A486301599B58D873F4E32A5AB00FA63D71E7F3A9235A95A0F