Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-08 17:26:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53F232EA9913B8779D426DCCA16464D73FF8A245726E38B82A1A85487B65EA79
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both current notes seem to be meant to highlight the replies of an obviously biased Twitter user. Whether or not she had a second wedding is irrelevant to the factual claims made in this tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633511536458350593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53F232EA9913B8779D426DCCA16464D73FF8A245726E38B82A1A85487B65EA79
  • createdAtMillis - 1678296360258
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163351153645835059353F232EA9913B8779D426DCCA16464D73FF8A245726E38B82A1A85487B65EA79