Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-27 12:29:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2AC008DE9752D48711B5E4EA13F35029A2C9662E3353609E4EDF9A1117CADAD8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Both current notes seem to be meant to highlight the replies of an obviously biased Twitter user. Whether or not she had a second wedding is irrelevant to the factual claims made in this tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633511536458350593
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2AC008DE9752D48711B5E4EA13F35029A2C9662E3353609E4EDF9A1117CADAD8
  • createdAtMillis - 1709036972204
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16335115364583505932AC008DE9752D48711B5E4EA13F35029A2C9662E3353609E4EDF9A1117CADAD8