Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-08 16:55:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E19C535EC3F5F2831B9BA2AA8FDF29B251BEF7C71909A003B81DBFCB16138C44
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original news report can be found here. https://www.wsj.com/articles/twitter-investigation-ftc-musk-documents-db6b179e It is factually correct that the FTC requested reporters’ names. Whether this is a violation of the First Amendment should be debated in comments. Courts have opined on this already. https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1146/reporter-s-privilege

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633469784330256389
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E19C535EC3F5F2831B9BA2AA8FDF29B251BEF7C71909A003B81DBFCB16138C44
  • createdAtMillis - 1678294527186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1633469784330256389E19C535EC3F5F2831B9BA2AA8FDF29B251BEF7C71909A003B81DBFCB16138C44