Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 21:31:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 631B482ECC67F2EEF51B5B66A380F7DF13C6D4604B278E34E7E23980B645E3B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the fellow truly "did no actual work" then he would be in violation of his employment contract - shouldn't that be verified by the legal and HR teams of Twitter? Otherwise it's just hearsay that can hurt this man's reputation and ability to work again.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633150507396247554
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 631B482ECC67F2EEF51B5B66A380F7DF13C6D4604B278E34E7E23980B645E3B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1678224677084
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1633150507396247554631B482ECC67F2EEF51B5B66A380F7DF13C6D4604B278E34E7E23980B645E3B1