Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-08 01:04:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00CB71F8CD6D858E6F9D6F8E52C2D94B61078D4EF01E5D76E3297DFC8338678C
Participant Details

Original Note:

If the fellow truly "did no actual work" then he would be in violation of his employment contract - shouldn't that be verified by the legal and HR teams of Twitter? Otherwise it's just hearsay that can hurt this man's reputation and ability to work again.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1633150507396247554
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00CB71F8CD6D858E6F9D6F8E52C2D94B61078D4EF01E5D76E3297DFC8338678C
  • createdAtMillis - 1678237457895
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163315050739624755400CB71F8CD6D858E6F9D6F8E52C2D94B61078D4EF01E5D76E3297DFC8338678C